This is one of those “wait, did they really just say that?” moments in tech that makes you want to double-check your privacy settings immediately.
During a recent Senate hearing, a former Meta employee (back when it was still Facebook) made a chilling admission. I’ve seen some aggressive marketing tactics in my time, but this takes the cake for being both technologically advanced and ethically bankrupt.
The “Vulnerability” Algorithm
I noticed a recurring theme in the testimony from Wynn-Williams: Meta wasn’t just tracking what teens liked; it was tracking how they felt. * The Target: Teens aged 13 to 17.
-
The Strategy: Identifying moments when these kids felt “worthless,” “helpless,” or like a “failure.”
-
The Goal: Sharing that emotional state with advertisers to pitch products at the exact moment a teen’s defenses were down.
The Business of Insecurity
Interestingly, the logic here is as simple as it is cruel. Advertisers know that when you don’t feel good about yourself, you’re more likely to buy something to “fix” the feeling.
-
The Selfie Trigger: If a teenage girl deletes a selfie, the system flags it. Advertisers might then see that as the perfect window to sell her beauty products.
-
Body Image Exploitation: When young girls showed concerns about body confidence, the platform reportedly served them weight-loss ads.
Why It Matters
This isn’t just about “relevant ads.” It’s about emotional surveillance. For us as users, it means the platform isn’t just a place to connect; it’s an engine that mines our mental health for profit. If an algorithm can detect when a teenager is depressed and chooses to sell that data rather than offer help, we have a massive systemic problem in how “Engagement” is measured.
Quick Takeaway: The Tactics
-
Emotional Tracking: Identifying specific feelings like “worthlessness.”
-
Real-time Exploitation: Using actions (like deleting a photo) as a signal for low self-esteem.
-
Strategic Ad Placement: Prioritizing sales for beauty and weight-loss products during emotional lows.
What do you think? Does this change how you feel about the “free” apps we use every day? I’ll be keeping a close eye on how Meta responds to these specific allegations.
